Food was never a perk at Google. It was a bet on how people work.

When Helen Wechsler, Senior Director, Food Program CoE at Google, talks about the company’s food program, she does not frame it as a benefit designed to impress. 

Instead, she frames it as culture. From the earliest days, meals were how the original Google team gathered, talked and built trust. Long before sprawling campuses or polished cafes, food was the thing that brought them together and kept them there.

Today, Google provides meals and access to food for employees across its offices worldwide. Cafes, micro kitchens on every floor, coffee and tea bars, teaching kitchens and even food trucks are part of how the company feeds its people. The scale is massive, but Wechsler is clear that feeding employees is not about abundance.

“We have a captive audience,” she says. “We are feeding people every day, and that comes with a really weighty responsibility.”

Related: How to Land a Job at Google, According to a Former Manager

That responsibility is evident immediately in Google’s New York City offices, where I interviewed Wechsler. She offered me some of the spa water— I couldn’t believe how good it was.

For Wechsler, that reaction is exactly the point. “We just wanted people to drink more water,” she explains. “Spa water is a good way to do that.”

It sounds simple, almost insignificant. But those small choices are deliberate. Hydration stations that feel inviting. Details that spark curiosity. Moments that slow people down just enough to feel cared for. When food is free, indifference is the easiest failure. Wechsler calls it the shrug. Google refuses that approach.

Related: The Life-Changing Effects of Drinking More Water

“We want to be that joy in the day,” she says. “We want it to feel seamless.”

Hospitality, in this context, is not transactional. It is relational. Food becomes the cultural connector inside a highly technical environment. A reminder that no matter how advanced the work becomes, people still come together the same way they always have.

Over a meal.

Technology that cares

At Google’s scale, good intentions are not enough.

Feeding people well requires systems that can absorb uncertainty, adapt quickly and still leave room for care. Technology is what makes that possible — it protects hospitality at scale.

“Technology is your best friend if you use it correctly,” she says. “It helps you evaluate, helps you predict, helps you think in a different way.”

That philosophy shapes how Google approaches AI. The food team is not chasing automation for its own sake or looking for perfect answers. They are experimenting. Testing. Learning in public. AI becomes a tool to stretch thinking rather than narrow it.

“Play with it,” she says. “Use it, use it, use it.”

That mindset matters because Google operates with a level of unpredictability most restaurants never face. There is no register. No ordering funnel. No reliable way to know who will walk in on any given day. People come and go freely, which makes food waste a constant concern.

Related: Google Reportedly Told Its Staff to Use AI More or Risk Falling Behind

Over the past eight years, technology has helped bring clarity to that chaos. Menu management systems, recipe scaling and pre- and post-production records allow teams to compare what they expected to serve with what was actually eaten. The real breakthrough came when the data became visual.

“Until we started measuring it visually, it didn’t stick,” Wechsler says.

Today, waste is photographed, weighed and logged automatically. Images recognize the food, connect it to menus, and surface patterns that chefs can actually act on. If something consistently comes back untouched, it sparks a conversation. Maybe the recipe is wrong. Maybe the timing is off. Maybe it simply does not resonate.

Technology also supports creativity. Trim becomes spa water. Fruit scraps turn into new beverages. Excess ingredients find second lives in jams, chutneys or entirely new dishes. Measurement does not kill imagination. It fuels it.

The lesson for restaurants watching from the outside is simple. Technology should make people calmer, not busier. More thoughtful, not more reactive. When used well, it gives teams the space to care better.

Hospitality still belongs to humans. Technology just helps them see what matters.

About Restaurant Influencers

Restaurant Influencers is brought to you by Toast, the powerful restaurant point-of-sale and management system that helps restaurants improve operations, increase sales and create a better guest experience.

Toast — Powering Successful Restaurants. Learn more about Toast.

Read more: Want to Open a Restaurant? Here’s a Step-By-Step Guide

Read more...

Artificial intelligence has dominated executive briefings, investor decks and earnings calls for the better part of three years. But here’s the part nobody likes to say out loud: Most organizations are not struggling with AI innovation — they’re struggling with AI execution.

Many initiatives look impressive in demos and pilots, but fail the moment they’re expected to operate inside a real business. They generate buzz. They produce slides. They never become production-ready systems that materially affect outcomes.

That gap between experimentation and production is where most AI initiatives die.

According to research from McKinsey & Company, while more than 70% of companies report adopting AI in at least one function, only a small minority say their efforts have translated into scaled, enterprise-level impact. The issue isn’t access to models or tooling. It’s the inability to take AI from proof-of-concept to production-ready deployment.

That disconnect between boardroom excitement and bottom-line reality tells us something important: The AI problem inside corporations isn’t technical. It’s executive and organizational.

This is not an abstract problem. It’s a leadership problem. It affects every executive who has approved an “AI initiative” because it sounded strategic, only to discover later that it wasn’t actionable, scalable or measurable.

The real reason AI projects die in pilot limbo

Across sectors from finance to healthcare to logistics, many AI initiatives stall before they ever deliver material business value. Gartner has repeatedly warned that a significant share of AI and generative AI projects fail to progress beyond pilot or proof-of-concept stages due to unclear business value, poor data readiness and governance gaps.

Why? The causes aren’t mysterious:

1. AI starts as a technology project, not a business solution: Teams build models without clearly defining the business problem or KPIs they are intended to affect.

2. Leaders don’t define success clearly before execution: Expectations on accuracy, cost, risk tolerances and decision rights are often undefined or unrealistic.

3. Accountability is fuzzy: When an AI system makes a bad recommendation inside a lending decision, pricing engine or clinical workflow, who owns the fallout? Rarely anyone with clear authority.

My experience: From buzz to business value

As a CEO, investor and founder, I’ve witnessed this pattern firsthand.

In 2024, my firm evaluated a mid-market financial services company that had invested millions in AI pilots. They had dashboards, proofs-of-concept and presentations, but no scalable deployments. Their models weren’t integrated with risk frameworks, approval workflows or governance guardrails. They failed not because the AI was bad, but because the organization never translated pilot insights into business execution.

This pattern repeats across industries: Organizations treat AI like a check in the innovation box, not a system with economic and operational constraints.

What “production-ready AI” actually means

There’s a phrase tossed around in tech circles: “production-ready AI.”

Leaders nod, but few can define it.

From an operator’s standpoint, production-ready AI must satisfy three conditions:

• Performance at scale — consistent outputs across real customers and edge cases

• Accuracy and context awareness — decisions must consider real-world complexity

• Governance and auditability — compliance, explainability and controls

When evaluating production readiness, the strongest teams stop treating AI as traditional software and instead model it as a decision-making agent inside the organization, one with autonomy, influence and real risk.

That shift changes how AI is designed and governed. Leaders explicitly define what the system is allowed to decide, what information it can access, when it must escalate to a human and who owns the outcome when it’s wrong. Without this structure, AI may perform well in isolation but fail once embedded in real workflows.

This is why ground truth validation, stress testing and ongoing performance review are not technical niceties — they are governance mechanisms. They determine whether an AI system can be trusted to operate at scale or whether it remains a controlled experiment. Without them, AI stays a demo. With them, it becomes operational.

Industry practitioners and applied AI researchers have consistently emphasized that rigorous production readiness testing, including stress testing and validation against real-world outcomes, is essential for successful deployment and long-term performance.

Why AI is a leadership problem — not a technical one

This is where executives get uncomfortable.

AI isn’t merely a software change. It changes behavior, incentives and decision pathways.

A recent Deloitte survey found that companies with strong AI governance frameworks were twice as likely to realize measurable returns on their AI investments.

That’s not accidental. When leaders insist on speed without clarity, governance and accountability fall by the wayside. Teams rush prototypes into workflows they don’t fully understand or control.

Effective AI governance means:

• Clear decision rights

• Defined escalation paths

• Human-in-the-loop checkpoints

• Loss limits and rollback procedures

Without these, AI becomes a forward-looking black box that executives don’t truly own.

The most common executive mistakes in AI

Based on my experience and supported by industry research, these are the executive behaviors that most frequently sink AI efforts:

• Mistake #1 — Approving AI without clear success metrics: If you can’t define what a meaningful outcome looks like before you build it, you don’t have an AI project; you have a guess.

• Mistake #2 — Avoiding understanding because of “technical complexity”: If leadership can’t summarize the solution in business terms, it’s not ready to be operationalized.

• Mistake #3 — Treating AI as a shortcut to innovation instead of a strategic capability: Speed without structure leads to brittle systems that fail when exposed to real use cases.

Toward an era of executable AI

The gap between AI hype and real outcomes isn’t closing by accident. It’s narrowing where organizations:

• Align AI with business KPIs

• Define accountability and governance up front

• Treat deployment as phased delivery, not a one-time launch

• Demand measurable outcomes, not demo artifacts

AI doesn’t fail because it’s too advanced. It fails because leaders treat it like a slide deck exercise.

It’s time to stop celebrating pilots and start rewarding production impact.
That’s when AI stops being a buzzword and starts being a business multiplier.

Sign up for the Entrepreneur Daily newsletter to get the news and resources you need to know today to help you run your business better. Get it in your inbox.

Read more...

Earning online does not necessarily depend on creating original articles, videos or products from scratch. By organizing, sorting and presenting existing information in a useful way, many profitable businesses are built. This approach often reduces time costs, reduces creative pressure and scales up faster than traditional content production. Regardless of media, commerce or education, curation is a reliable source of income for modern entrepreneurs.

Curation works because, while attention is finite, information is infinite.

Curating works because attention is limited while information is endless. When someone consistently highlights the best resources in a specific area, trust grows. That trust can be monetized in several practical and repeatable ways.

Why curation is a real business model

Curation is often misunderstood as copying or reposting. In fact, it involves selection, context and relevance. The value comes from deciding what matters and why it matters now. In competitive markets, this sorting function is often more valuable than originality.

Several factors explain why curated models continue to perform well:

• Information overload has increased across every industry

• Decision fatigue makes trusted filters more valuable

• Distribution is often harder than creation

• Many creators prefer reach over direct monetization

When these conditions are met, curation platforms connect demand and supply. The following five models provide practical examples.

1. Curated newsletters that monetize attention

Curated newsletters are one of the most reliable ways to earn money from curation. Instead of writing long sentences, the publisher selects the most relevant links, insights and updates from the web and distributes them on a fixed schedule. The biggest advantage is that you can continue without burning out.

The three main sources of revenue are the following:

• Premium version paid subscription

• Sponsorship frames in curation links

• Affiliate alliance linked to referral tools and products

Powerful curated newsletters tend to focus on narrow topics such as industry news, transaction tracking, job openings and research summaries.

2. Affiliate revenue through curated resource pages

Affiliate marketing requires no proprietary products or extensive content editing. In many cases, simple curation lists outperform long-sentence reviews. The reason is clarity. Visitors often seek a short list of trusted options, rather than a complete purchase guide.

Reliability is born from transparency and relevance, not compelling language. High-performance curated affiliate pages typically include:

• Distinct classification rather than ranking

• A brief background explanation of why each item was chosen

• Regular updates to remove obsolete choices

Platforms such as Amazon, Gumroad and PartnerStack support this technique in both physical and digital products.

3. Paid communities built around curated knowledge

Many experts are willing to pay to access premium information filtered in private spaces. These are not content-focused communities, but signal-based communities. Values are “shared” and “excluded.”

In this model, the curator acts as the gatekeeper. Articles, tools, case studies and opportunities are sorted before they reach the members. This saves time for people operating in fast-changing areas.

Common formats include Slack groups, private forums and email-based digests in conjunction with discussion access. Successful communities have something in common:

• Clear and professional results associated with curation

• Strict moderation for signal quality maintenance

• Limited growth for trust protection

This model is particularly effective in areas specializing in finance, marketing, technology and adoption.

4. Curated marketplaces that connect buyers and sellers

Curation also plays a core role in modern marketplaces. Many platforms have succeeded by carefully selecting the content of the publication rather than open exhibits. These build trust faster than scale-priority models.

Etsy and niche recruitment sites are good examples of curation improving conversion rates. The user revisits because the choice is not random but feels pre-approved.

Monetization usually combines one or more of the following structures:

• The posting fee by the seller

• Fees at the time of termination

• Premium rates for featured posts

Because the marketplace itself is valuable, its own content is not required.

5. Data and research curation for business clients

One of the most valuable curation models is data integration. Many companies lack the time to track trends, reports and competitive trends across multiple sources. Curators who aggregate and summarize such information can charge a premium fee.

This model is often offered in the following ways:

• Weekly industry briefing

• Competition monitoring report

• Trending snapshots for executives

Instead of conducting new research, curators integrate public data, news, submissions and expert commentary into a single, readable deliverable.

Common mistakes that limit curation income

Despite the potential, curation fails in light execution. You can’t build trust just by reposting links without context. Successful curators treat choices as responsibilities, not shortcuts.

Key challenges common to low-quality curation projects include:

• The topic range is too wide

• Ignoring update cycles

• No explanation or contextualization

• Mixing unrelated content types

Good curation feels intentional. The adoption of each piece of content meets the specific needs of a specific audience.

Curation is not an escape for those who avoid creation. It is a business model built on hobbies, discipline and consistency. In a world where information is flooded, the ability to judge what is noteworthy is rare and valuable.

For entrepreneurs who value efficiency and sustainability, monetization from curation provides a realistic path. It is not as flashy as content production, but its results often last longer.

Sign up for the Money Makers newsletter to get weekly, expert-backed tips to help you earn more money — from real people who founded and scaled successful businesses. Get it in your inbox.

Read more...

Most people believe that if they work hard, take ownership and deliver results, a successful career will naturally follow. I believed that too — until I became a leader.

What I see now is the flaw in that thinking.

Many of the real rules of advancement inside organizations are never written down, rarely taught and almost never intentionally coached.

Early in my career, I assumed productivity alone would separate top performers from everyone else. I said yes to every project. I worked long hours. I delivered early and asked for more. From where I sat, effort felt like currency.

What I didn’t understand then — and what many employees still don’t understand today — is that while some people are heads-down executing, others are heads-up navigating the enterprise.

As leaders, this is the gap we’re responsible for closing.

Below are six unspoken rules founders and business leaders must actively coach if they want to develop future leaders rather than burn out their highest performers.

Rule 1: Hard work is the baseline, not the differentiator

In high-performing organizations, hard work is assumed. Effort gets people in the game, but it rarely determines who advances. What separates people is how clearly their work connects to what leadership actually cares about.

I learned this early in my career at Microsoft. I was surrounded by people who were just as smart and just as hardworking as I was. I said yes to everything, delivered quickly, and took pride in my output. Productivity felt like progress.

What I eventually realized was that leaders weren’t rewarding volume. They were rewarding relevance.

Peers with similar workloads were pulled into cross-functional initiatives, leadership discussions, and opportunities I didn’t even know existed. The difference wasn’t how much work they were doing — it was how they talked about their work. They framed it in terms of business impact rather than technical execution. They connected their projects to growth, efficiency, or transformation in language leaders recognized immediately.

Once I stopped describing what I built and started explaining why it mattered, everything changed. My workload didn’t increase. My visibility did.

Most employees default to reporting tasks unless leaders teach them otherwise. A simple coaching habit is to ask team members to explain their work in one sentence that ties directly to a company priority.

Rule 2: Visibility comes from alignment, not volume

Doing more work doesn’t make someone more visible. Doing the right work, in the right forums, does.

Many employees assume visibility comes from being busy or indispensable. In reality, visibility is created when work moves what matters most.

I’ve seen careers accelerate when people volunteered for enterprise initiatives or cross-functional efforts with executive sponsorship — even when those projects sat outside their formal role. These opportunities create exposure, trust and advocates that day-to-day execution rarely does.

Presence matters, too. Remote work is efficient, but visibility requires intention. Trust is built through context, proximity, and informal interaction.

If leaders don’t clarify where visibility comes from, employees either overwork or disengage. Be explicit about which initiatives matter, where leadership attention is focused, and how people can contribute beyond their immediate scope.

Rule 3: Relationships are a productivity multiplier, not a distraction

Many high performers believe relationship-building takes time away from “real work.” In reality, it removes friction from the work.

The people I’ve seen advance fastest were rarely the ones doing everything themselves. They were the ones who knew who to call, how decisions actually get made, and where resistance would show up before it did.

I learned this firsthand working across cultures and geographies early in my career. Once trust was established, decisions moved faster—not slower. Relationships created leverage.

Normalize relationship-building as a cultural expectation. Encourage structured cross-functional exposure and reward collaboration. When relationships are treated as optional, execution becomes harder than it needs to be.

Rule 4: Leaders promote capability signals, not just competence

When leaders decide who’s ready for more responsibility, they look beyond metrics.

The first signal I look for is self-awareness. Leaders want to know you understand your strengths and development areas. Self-aware people ask for help at the right moments, which builds confidence in their judgment.

Next is enterprise awareness—the ability to understand strategic priorities and frame decisions in terms leaders recognize as aligned.

Finally, people skills matter. Results are critical, but how those results are delivered matters just as much. Leaders notice who can move work forward without burning bridges.

Reward self-awareness, not false confidence. Teach employees how to frame decisions in enterprise terms and intervene early when results come at the expense of trust.

Rule 5: Managers can’t advocate for what they can’t see

Once I started participating in talent review sessions, a clear pattern emerged. People who were promoted had simple, repeatable narratives attached to them: reliable, strategic, strong cross-functional partner.

Those narratives weren’t created through last-minute self-promotion. They were built over time through consistent communication.

Teach managers and employees that structured updates enable effective advocacy. Simple weekly or biweekly updates covering progress, risks managed, and what’s next make promotion decisions more informed and more fair.

Rule 6: The system rewards patterns, not potential

When organizations promote or restructure, they reduce risk by advancing people who already look like they’re operating at the next level. How someone communicates, handles ambiguity, and makes decisions matters as much as what they deliver.

Early in my career, I benchmarked myself against people one level above me — not my peers. By practicing those behaviors early, I became a safer promotion choice when opportunities emerged. I encourage the same approach in career conversations today.

Make next-level expectations explicit. When people don’t know what “ready” looks like, promotions will always feel political.

The leadership advantage most companies miss

These rules exist in every organization, whether leaders acknowledge them or not. When founders fail to teach them, employees learn through trial, error, and burnout. When founders teach them explicitly, development accelerates and trust deepens.

The real advantage isn’t just better performance — it’s creating a culture where people understand how work is actually valued, feel empowered in their careers and are equipped to grow.

If you want a final polish for a specific outlet (LinkedIn, blog, internal memo) or a tighter executive cut, just say the word.

Sign up for the Entrepreneur Daily newsletter to get the news and resources you need to know today to help you run your business better. Get it in your inbox.

Read more...